It seems that primary schools are doing very well, but transition is a problem. Secondary schools are too often not picking up where primary schools left off and KS3 teaching is not effective enough.
Bill Watkin, Operational Director SSAT, picks out the key points – and offers some grounds for optimism…
On 3 November, the Secretary of State announced a review of assessment in primary schools. She explained that this was part of her strategy to support greater rigour. Nicky Morgan
- re-iterated the plan for those who do not reach the new expected standard at the end of KS2 to resit their KS2 tests in Y7;
- proposed that the KS1 tests should revert to the externally set and assessed model that existed pre-2004;
- said that KS1 test data should be submitted to DfE, so that DfE can use the data to identify progress regression lines;
- suggested that the KS1 test should be the baseline measure from which progress to KS2 is calculated (I am not sure where this leaves the new Reception baseline measure for 5-year-olds, on which so much time, energy and resource has been spent recently).
Key stage 3 – the wasted years?
In September, Ofsted published Key Stage 3 – the wasted years?. The report takes a critical look at teaching in Years 7, 8 and 9.
Schools Week offered a helpful list of the key points in the report, including:
- Teaching and achievement are often not good enough in KS3 MFL, history and geography
- 85% of secondary school leaders said they staffed KS4/5 ahead of KS3
- ‘Too many’ secondary schools do not work effectively with partner primary schools
- Half of the interviewed pupils said their homework never helped them make progress
- Pupil premium was too often used on KS4 pupils to ‘compensate’ for ineffective progress in earlier secondary education.
Chief inspector’s commentary
On 27 October, Sir Michael Wilshaw published his first monthly commentary, looking at the improving performance of primary schools, ‘and how these need to be carried through to our secondary schools.’
His key points included:
- Compared with 2012, over 60,000 more primary school pupils this year achieved good levels of reading and writing, and maths.
- Around 90% of 6-7 year olds now reach the expected standards in literacy and maths at the end of KS1.
- There were 2,293 more good and outstanding primary schools in the last academic year than in 2011-12.
- A key factor has been a focus on ensuring that all pupils get a solid grounding in the basic knowledge, understanding and skills.
- The emphasis on high-quality, effective synthetic phonics teaching from the early years onwards (terms like blending and segmenting, phonemes and digraphs are firmly embedded in the classroom vocabulary).
- A strong and welcome focus on higher standards of grammar and punctuation from the earliest years of primary school.
- Much of this good, structured work done in primary schools, both in writing and speaking, is lost when pupils enter the secondary phase.
- Worse still, the rigour with which spelling, punctuation and grammar is being taught at primary stage is often not developed sufficiently at secondary stage, especially in the foundation subjects. This is particularly damaging for the most able pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds – who disproportionately fail to fulfil their earlier potential when they come to sit their GCSEs.
Phonics and grammar
So, the improved performance in primary schools is attributed in part to an emphasis on the teaching of synthetic phonics (not everyone would agree that this is the panacea that we would like it to be), and the terminology and rules of grammar (not everyone would agree that being able to identify a subjunctive or a relative clause will engender a love of language, or even a facility with it).
Some teachers and pupils in KS2 are wrestling with the new grammar expectations that are supposedly linked to improvements in writing and communications. Sample test questions include:
- Rewrite the following sentence so that it is written in the passive voice:
The pouring rain drenched us.
- Complete the following sentence so that it uses the subjunctive form:
If I…. to have one wish, it would be for good health.
- Circle the adverb in the following sentence:
‘Soon’, he thought, ‘I’ll be able to see my family.’
What’s the problem?
There are two particular problems to address, it seems to me:
Secondary teachers too often do not know the content of the KS2 curriculum and do not have an opportunity to work with primary colleagues to ensure a smooth transition.
DfE’s decision that pupils who do not do well enough in their KS2 SATs will have to resit them in Year 7 is due to be in place by September 2017 (though a consultation is due to be launched in early 2016). There are many risks attached to this, not least of which is a reinforced focus on a narrow curriculum (reading, writing, maths), probably at the expense of a broader curriculum (technology, art, drama).
This, it seems to me, is an ill-conceived strategy, with very little going for it. However, there is likely to be one unintended and beneficial consequence: Y7 teachers, who will be charged with teaching the KS2 curriculum for the less able in Y7, and with preparing them for the SAT resits, first in the Spring and then, if necessary, again in the summer, will now have to really know the KS2 curriculum.
Secondary teachers are not aware enough of the greater rigour and higher standards now expected of primary schools and are not adapting their secondary curriculum accordingly, in preparation for the new more advanced Y7 intake.
As pupils leave primary schools having followed a more demanding, rigorous and challenging curriculum, secondary teachers will have to refine their schemes of work and raise their expectations of the pupils if we are to avoid taking a step backwards at the start of KS3.
As a French teacher for most of my working life, I have very often been faced with a brand new class at the start of Y7. I would always start by asking them, with some trepidation, who had studied French at primary school.
Inevitably, half the class would put their hand up. So there I was, faced with 30 11-year-olds, of whom 15 had done four years of French in primary school, while the other 15 may have never heard any word of French before.
So how should I approach this class? How could I teach such a mixed group? Of course this will be less of a problem in the future, now that languages are compulsory throughout KS2.
Well, I hang my head in shame and confess that the way I dealt with it was to assume that the pupils had not been taught properly in primary school, so we would all start from the beginning. Absolutely appalling, I know. But quite convenient.
Grounds for optimism
Curriculum transition can be more effectively handled if secondary and primary teachers learn from each other and share knowledge, skills and strategies; if there is a greater degree of information exchange and trust. And my main grounds for optimism here are these:
The removal of national curriculum levels will reduce the mistrust that was caused to some extent by their apparent inconsistencies (a Y6 Level 4 is not the same as a Y7 Level 4) and to some extent by the way primary schools have been measured.
KS3 teachers will have to learn how to prepare Y7 pupils for a KS2 resit; this means they must become familiar with the content of the KS2 curriculum and tests (see above).
The new and more demanding GCSE specifications will require secondary schools to make the most of every learning opportunity, from the very start of Y7, and to avoid underestimating new cohorts’ standards.
Teachers are writing new schemes of work and developing new materials and resources right now (see recent Smestow School case study). They have an ideal opportunity to work towards a more seamless transition from one key stage to another.
Follow Bill on Twitter: @billwatkin
Follow SSAT on Twitter: @SSAT